Gaussian process landscapes can model various protein sequence. Informative path planning and mapping with multiple uavs in. Gaussian process based iaq distribution mapping using an. There are several common strategies to address this task, for example, geometry or disk models, placing sensors at the points of highest entropy variance in the gp model, and a, d, or eoptimal design. Unlike existing sensor placement solutions that assume gaussian process of target phenomena, this study measures the wind which inherently exhibits strong non gaussian yearly distribution. Adaptive sampling for learning gaussian processes using. The epub format uses ebook readers, which have several ease of. This algorithm is extended to exploit local structure in the gaussian process, significantly improving performance. Learning a spatial field with gaussian process regression in. What are some applications of gaussian process models. Sensor placement strategies for snow water equivalent swe estimation in the american river basin stephen c. Within each cluster, a quantitative sensor placement algorithm, based on maximizing the metric of mutual information, was implemented and compared to random placement.
Finally, we show that the sensor placements chosen by our algorithm can lead to significantly better predictions through extensive experimental validation on two realworld datasets. Nearoptimal active learning of multioutput gaussian processes. Optimal sensor placements when using a traditional gaussian process gp approach blue spheres or a weak constraint gaussian process wcgp approach red spheres in algorithm 4. Current state of the art selects such a set so as to minimize the posterior variance of the gaussian process by exploiting submodularity. Pdf nearoptimal sensor placements in gaussian processes. In 12, the authors employed gaussian processes gps to build nonparametric probabilistic models using data from a pilot sensor work deployment, for monitoring spatial phenomena of interest. Nearoptimal sensor placements in gaussian processes learning. Theory, efficient algorithms and empirical studies. Optimal nonmyopic value of information in graphical models efficient algorithms and theoretical limits. Surface heat assessment for developed environments.
Sensor placement strategies for snow water equivalent swe. Though polynomial, the complexity of our basic algorithm is relatively highokn4 to select k out of n possible sensor locations. Danie krige, is generally credited with the first use of a gplike model in the 1950s to model the distribution of ore content in south african mines from a small number of samples. Doubly stochastic variational inference for deep gaussian processes. Multitype sensor placements in gaussian spatial fields for. Realtime optimal path planning and wind estimation using gaussian process. Andreas krause, ajit singh, carlos guestrin, nearoptimal sensor placements in gaussian processes. A common strategy is to place sensors at the points of highest entropy variance in the gp model. Efficient and provably near optimal sensor placement in gaussian process models using the conditional entropy metric and greedy optimization is discussed in detail by ref. Bode is characterized by sequentially querying the function at specific designs selected by an infillsampling criterion.
Nearoptimal sensor placements in gaussian processes. Deep gaussian processes dgps are multilayer generalizations of gps, but. Optimal sensor placement based on gaussian process. A typical sensor placement technique is to greedily add sensors where uncertainty about the phenomena is highest, that is, the highest entropy location of the gp. An introduction to gaussian processes for the kalman filter. Nearoptimal sensor placements in gaussian processes 2005. Krause in electronic journal of statistics, the institute of mathematical statistics and the bernoulli society.
Theory, efficient algorithms and empirical studies, the journal of. Mar 14, 2018 this paper presents an systematic procedure for ipp and environmental mapping using multiple uav sensor platforms. Andreas krause, ajit paul singh, and carlos guestrin. Optimizing sensor placements usually, we are limited to deploying a small number of sensors, and thus must carefully choose where to place them. Gaussian processes gps both for the spatial phenomena of inter est and for. The results in this setting, however, are not directly applicable. A key issue in gaussian process modeling is to decide on the locations where measurements are going to be taken.
Rankbased clustering was compared to geographically based clustering subbasin delineation to determine the existence of stationary covariance structures within the overall swe dataset. In order to predict the temperature at one of these locations from the other sensor readings,weneedthejointdistributionovertemperaturesatthe54locations. When monitoring spatial phenomena, which can often be modeled as gaussian processes gps, choosing sensor locations is a fundamental task. This approach is based on a class of anisotropic covariance functions of gaussian processes introduced to model a broad range of spatiotemporal physical phenomena. The numbers within the spheres denote the sensors ids as given in table 4.
Near optimal bayesian active learning with correlated and noisy tests y. Proceedings of the 24th international conference on machine learning, pages 449456, 2007. For gaussian process models, conditional entropy can be efficiently computed from the posterior covariance k t y of eq. Optimal sensor placement based on gaussian process regression. Comparison of probabilistic chain graphical modelbased and. Nearoptimal sensor placements in gaussian processes core.
Theory, efficient algorithms and empirical studies, the journal of machine learning research, 9, p. To resolve this issue, we first exploit a structure common to sparse mogp models for deriving a novel active learning criterion. Roberts, journal2010 th international conference on information fusion, year2010, pages19 steven reece, stephen j. Nearoptimal sensor placements cornell computer science. The epub format uses ebook readers, which have several ease of reading features already built in. Jan 21, 2012 gps actually arose out of an application. When monitoring spatial phenomena, which are often modeled as gaussian processes gps, choosing sensor locations is a fundamental task. The covariance function is assumed to be unknown a priori. Recursive path planning and wind field estimation for. Emulating dynamic nonlinear simulators using gaussian processes. Theory, efficient algorithms and empirical studies a krause, a singh, c guestrin journal of machine learning research 9 feb, 235284, 2008.
Hence, it is estimated by the maximum a posteriori probability map estimator. Maximizing information while minimizing communication cost. These models, based on gaussian processes, allow us to avoid strong assumptions previously made in the literature. Using submodularity to analyze sequential experimental design in gaussian processes with uncertain kernel parameters. Gradient descent for gaussian processes variance reduction. Near optimal sensor placements in gaussian processes by andreas krause, ajit singh, carlos guestrin, chris williams in icml, 2005 when monitoring spatial phenomena, which can often be modeled as gaussian processes gps, choosing sensor locations is a fundamental task. Navigating the protein fitness landscape with gaussian processes. Weak constraint gaussian processes for optimal sensor placement. Near optimal sensor placements in gaussian processes. Optimal sensor placement and measurement of wind for water. Gaussian process 14,26 is a powerful formalism for predict the probability distributions over sensor values at uncovered locations. Amarjeet singh, andreas krause, carlos guestrin, and william j kaiser. Krause, a, singh, a, guestrin, c 2008 near optimal sensor placements in gaussian processes. Nearoptimal sensor placements in gaussian processes 3.
Citeseerx citation query statistics for spatial data. In this work, we study an optimal sensor placement scheme to measure the wind distribution over a large urban reservoir with a limited number of wind sensors. Exploiting the concept of submodularity, this algorithm is guaranteed to provide near optimal placements for this hard. Gaussian process models were then built from validation data points selected by the algorithm to evaluate the efficacy of each placement approach. It a selects the best locations to observe, b calculates the cost and finds the best paths for each uav, and c estimates the measurement value within a given region using the gaussian process gp regression framework. Bayesian optimal design of experiments for inferring the. Theory, efficient algorithms and empirical studies february 2008 journal of machine learning research 9 1.
The intuition is that we want to pick a set of fixed size to maximize the mutual information between selected data points and nonselected data points. Citeseerx nearoptimal sensor placements in gaussian processes. Optimal sensor placement based on gaussian process regression for shared office spaces under various ventilation conditions. In this section, we propose a novel variational posterior and demonstrate a method. Optimizing waypoints for monitoring spatiotemporal phenomena. We propose a mutual information cri teria, and show that it. A novel and efficient algorithm for sensor placements at in. Bayesian optimal design of experiments bodes have been successful in acquiring information about a quantity of interest qoi which depends on a blackbox function. Sensor placement strategies for swe estimation in the. In spatial statistics this is called sampling design. A good set of observations will provide a better model. Optimal sensor placement we implement as well a greedy selection algorithm for near optimal sensor placement with gaussian processes.
316 1477 1115 1026 1166 1125 1312 1287 738 105 466 373 1244 764 1369 1170 1492 957 819 122 1473 594 743 394 1207 1223 1369 684 53 272 1075 740 1252 558 25 159 526 28 28 654